Список авторов:Haidur N. M. postgraduate student of the faculty of Journalism in International University of economics and humanities named after academician Stepan Demianchuk
Annotation. In the context of modern media practice, its factors are analyzed, which, through the
achievement of certain media effects, interact with the purpose of attracting the maximum possible
audience. It is also noted that the audience itself does not trust propaganda, whereas the audience
entrusts the mass media, which act as the bearers of a particular propaganda. Through the prism of the
phenomenon of communication reflux, the content of individual media groups is analyzed. It is noted
that communication becomes exhausted, it’s real functional capacity, pursuing the interests of the future,
is reduced for the present, for relevance, for the actual needs of the audience. The audience is not able to
respond to effects, structural manipulation, and processes that can lead to a cessation of the mass media’s
presentation of deformed reality that is spreading in society.
Ключевые слова:Key words: audience, communication, manipulation, media effects, media criticism, reflux. View Fullscreen
1. Appadurai A. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. — Minneapolis,
1996. — 229 p.
2. D. Holmes, Communication Theory. Media, Technology, Society, London–Thousand Oaks. –
New Delhi 2005, s. 136-139.
3. M. Callon, B. Latour, Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How Actors Macro-structure Reality and
How Sociologists Help Th em to Do So, 1981.
4. Alyushina N. Problems of Communication Effectiveness in the Life of a Society / N. Alyushin
— NAPA under the President of Ukraine — PDF.
5. Baudrillard J. Requiem for the mass media: [per. Fr.] / J. Baudriyar // Poetics and Politics: An
Almanac of the Russian-French Center for Sociology and Philosophy and the IAS of the Russian
Academy of Sciences. — M.: ISO; SPb : Alatea, 1999. — P. 193-226.
6. Bondarenko, Julia Stanislavovna. An alternative press of modern Germany (features of
functioning, editorial policy, place in the national media system): author’s abstract. Dis … Cand.
Sciences of Social Communications: 27.00.04 / Yuliya Stanislavovna Bondarenko. — Lviv: Bv., 2017. —
19 p. (Lviv National University named after Ivan Franko, date of defense: 2017)
7. Wareh, Nonna Vyacheslavivna. Formation of ethno-cultural stereotypes in high-quality British
press: structural, functional and informative features: author’s abstract. Dis … Cand. Sciences of Social
Communications: 27.00.04 / Nonna Vyacheslavovna Varekh. — Dnipropetrovsk: Bv., 2014. — 20 s.
(Dnipropetrovsk National University named after O. Gonchar, date of defense: 2014).
8. Verbitsky P. Corporate monopoly on information as a factor of the information strategy of the
state / Verbitsky P. / / Compilation of works of the Research Institute of Preschool Studies. — Lviv:
LNBU named after V. Stefanyk, 2017. — Vip. 7 (25). — C. 288–298.
9. Interaction // Wikipedia [Electronic resource]. — Access mode:
10. Zelinska N. V. The publicistic nature of Ukrainian scientific prose (attempt of a retrospective
review) / N.V. Zelinska // Vysn. Kiev. un-th them T. Shevchenko. — 1995. — Vip. 2. Journalism. — P.
11. Zolyak V. V. Convergence as a universal discovery of the coincidence of common features /
VV Zolyak // Prob. n.p. Center of periodicals Lviv. sciences BKI them. V. Stefanyk — Lviv, 2007. — Vip.
15. — P. 139-145.
12. Ivanov VF Sociology of Mass Communication: Teach. manual / VF Ivanov; Cherkasy state
Un-t them. B. Khmelnitsky — Cherkasy, 2003. — 193 p.
13. Kostenko N. Conclusion: To the sociology of mistrust / N. Kostenko, S. Makeev // Society
without trust / [ed. Philosophy N. Eugene Golovaki, d. Sociologist. N. Natalya Kostenko, d. Sociologist.
N. Sergiy Makeyev]. — Kyiv: IS NANU, 2014. — pp. 319-330.
14. Kostenko N. Media Dynamics: Trends and Deviations // Vectors of Changes in Ukrainian
Society / [ed. econ. N. V.M.Vorony, D.Sc. M.O.Shulgi]. — K .: IS NANU, 2014. — P. 326-348.
15. Kuznetsova, Tatiana Vasylivna. Axiological models of mass media information:
communicative-conceptual approach: author’s abstract. Dis … Doctor of Social Sciences: 27.00.01 /
Tetyana Vasilyevna Kuznetsova. — Kyiv: Bv., 2010. — 31 p. (KNU named after Taras Shevchenko, date of
protection: December 13, 10)
16. Latour B. Reassembly of the social: Introduction to actor-network theory [Text]. -M .: Izd.
House of the Higher School of Economics, 2014.-384 p.
17. Luman Niklas. The reality of the media. — Translated from German: A. Y. Antonovsky, edited
by O. V. Kiljadyusova, 2005. // Electronic publication: Center for Humanitarian Technologies. —
07/07/2008. URL: http://gtmarket.ru/laboratory/basis/3001
18. McQueil D. Theory of Mass Communication. — Lviv, Chronicle, 2010, p. 538
19. McLuhan M. Understanding Media: External Extensions of Man = Understanding Media: The
Extensions of Man / M. McLuhan. — M.: Kuchkovo field, 2007. — 464 p.
20. Maturana U. Biology of cognition / U. Maturana // Language and Intellect. M .: Progress,
1995. pp. 95-142.
21. Mihailin I. L. Information image as a communicative category / I. L. Mykhailin // Sb. Kharkiv
isp-philol. t-va. New series. — 2009 — T. 13 — P. 137-150.
22. Popper Carl. An open society and its enemies. T. I. In the captivity of Plato’s charm. — K .:
«Fundamentals», 1994. — 444 p.
23. Potejatynyk B. Media: Keys to Understanding / B. Potiatinyk. — Lviv: PAIS, 2004. — 312 p.
24. Pocheptsov G. G. Communicative Technologies of the Twentieth Century / G. G. Pocheptsov. —
M.: Refl-beech; K.: Wackler, 2000. — 352 pp.
25. Reflux // Wikipedia [Electronic resource]. — Access mode: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflux
26. Rizun V.V. Masses: texts of lectures / V.V.Rizun; Kiev. nats Un-t them. T. Shevchenko. — K.,
2003. — 116 p.