ETHNICAL PROCESS AND SOCIO-POLITICAL, ECONOMIC HISTORY IN THE HERITAGE OF PULAT SOLIYEV (32-37)

Список литературы: 1. The curriculum vitae, socio-enlightenment of Pulat Soliyev were revealed thoroughly by V.A.Germanov and F.Temirov. See: Germanov V.A. Professor Pulat Soliyev and his time. –T.: Fan, 2002. Temirov F. Pulat Soliyev. T.: Pulat Soliyev. ABU Matbuot Konsalt, 2011 2. Besides to being published as a special edition the papers of scholar were published in the “Maorif and uqituvchi” magazine. 3. Maorif va uqituvchi, 1927, No 7-8. 4. If we support this idea, it could lead towards the conclusion, that culture of the Khoresm is not part of the culture of Turkic population and the native of Central Asia. That’s why this idea was refuted by the scholar. 5. Pulat Soliyev doesn’t indicate the name of the paper of Biruni. As for us, it can be the work “The monuments which lasts from the ancient people”. Because there is an information on the scripts, language of Khoresm given by Biruni. 6. N.I.Veselovski (1848-1918) – Russian archeologist and orientalist. He had conducted archeological surveys in Samarkand. He is the author of the papers related with the social-political history of Central Asia. Pulat Soliyev had used the “Ocherk istoriko-geographicheskikh svedeniy o Khivinskom khanstve ot drevneyshikh vremen do nastoyashego” of N.I.Veselovski in writing the paper (Spb. 1877). 7. The opinions of Pulat Soliyev and academician V.Bartold are contradictory on the issue of the Khorezmi language. V.Bartold had admitted without checking the data of Arabic geographer Istakhri on the language of Khorezm which was “incomprehensible language” and declared that it was called Persianate language. Also, V.Bartold confirms that there are elements of ancient Iranian culture existing in the culture of Khorezm. He maintains the idea that the turkification of the Khorezm was completed in 13th. See: V.V.Bartold. K istorii orosheniye Turkestana. Soch. T.III. –Moscow, “Nauka”, 1965. P. 162. 8. Pulat Soliyev. Uzbeklar, ham Temur bolalari. // “Maorif va uqutguvchi” jurnali. –Tashkent, 1928. №5-6. 9. Some of the manuscripts were held in the personal library of Pulat Soliyev. The scholar mentions that the “Shaibaninama” was found in the 20s of the 20th century and gives broad commentary on this copy. 10. The tribes living in the Dashti qipchaq were collectively named as “nomadic Uzbeks” in the historical literature during the Soviet epoch. But Pulat Soliyev hadn’t used the term “nomadic” towards them, having used “Uzbek” or “Uzbeks”. 11. Pulat Soliyev paid attention to Shakhrukh’s being “wali”, “sakhibqiran”, Abulkhayrkhans being a recreant among the populace of Herat. 12. The ruler of Khoresm during this period was Emir Ibrahim. He had surrendered the city to the army of Abulkhayrkhan without any resistance. The clerics and the nobles required from emir Ibrakhim to accept all of the terms of the Abulkhayrkhon and were successful at it. See about it: Akhmedov B.A. Gosudarstvo kochevikh uzbekov. –Moscow: Nauka, 1965. –P.49-50; the same author. Uzbek ulusi. – Tashkent: Nur; 1992. 1992. –P.41-42. 13. There were other reasons for Abulkhayrkhan to leave Khoresm. The tribes under the leadership of Makhmudkhan and Akhmadkhan migrating in and around Aral were posing serious danger to the areas under the ulus of Abulkhayrkhan. 14. We should state that the limitedness of sources used by the Pulat Soliyey. The author mostly used to use the work “Bakhr ul-asrar” of Makhmud ibn Vali. The reason why he didn’t use the hagiographic work ‘’Rashakhat” remains unknown. 15. The current level of the researches on Khwaja Akhrar remains high. One of those who studied the issue V.V.Bartold specially mentioned the relations of Khwaja Akhrar and Abusaid. Also, the political activity of Akhrar Vali is reveled in the studies of O.D.Chekhovich, A.N. Boldyrev, B.A.Kazakov, J.Paul, B.Valikhujayev, Z.Quttiboyev, Joan Gross, A.Urinboyev, E.Karimov, B.Bobojonov, M.Qodirova. See: V.V. Bartold. Ulughbek I yego vremya. Soch. V 9-ti tomakh. T.2. ch. 2. –Moscow: Nauka, 1964. P. 169172.; Samarkandskiye dokumenti XV-XVI vv. (O vladeniyakh Khodji Akhrara v Sredfney Azii I Afganistane). Faksimile, kriticheskiy tekst, perevod, vvedeniye, primechaniya I ukazateli. O.D.Chekhovich. –Moscow: 1974; Boldyrev A.N.Yeshyo raz k voprosu o Khodje Akhrare// Istochnikovedeniye I tekstologiya srednevekovogo Blijnego I Srednego Vostoka v period feodalizma. Sbornik. Statey. –Moscow: Nauka, 1984. P.103-108; J.Paul. Forming a faction: The Himayat system of Khwaja Ahrar. // International Journal of Middle East Studies, 23 (1991); Valikhodjayev B. Khoja Akhror tarikhi. –Tashkent: Fan, 1996; Joann Gross. Sharia and Unbelief in the Letters of Khwaja Ubaydullakh Ahrar // The First International Conference of the Association for the Study of Persianate societies (ASPS) in Dushanbe XVI-XVII September, 2002 (Invitation program, p.5), the same author; Gross Joann, A. Urinbayev. The letters of Khwaja Ubayid Allah Ahrar and his Associates. Leiden, 2002; Karimov E. Khuja Ahrar hayoti va faoliyati. Tashkent: Ma’naviyat, 2003; Babadjanov B. K voprosu o vospriyatii statusa sufiyskogo shaykha na primere Khwaja Ahrara // Arabskiy Vostok, islam drevnyaya Aravia. Sbornik statey v chest. V.V. Naumkina. Moscow, 2005. P.177-190.; Kadirova M. Jitiya Khodja Ahrara. Opyt sistemnogo analiza po rekonstruksii biografii Khodja Ahrara I istorii roda Ahraridov. –Tashkent: Frantsuzskiy institut issledovaniy Tsentralnoy Azii (IFEAC), 2007. 16. As we have mentioned before, because of the fact that Pulat Soliyev hadn’t used the data offered in the “Rashakhat”, he left out the relations of Khwaja Ahrar with the shaykh ul-islam of Samarkand Burkhanuddin (Khwaja Mavlana valid Khwaja Isamiddin). In reality the relations between these two clerics had sharp upward trend. The shaykh ul- islam Burkhanuddin (Khwaja Mavlana valid Khwaja Isamiddin) who had feeling against Khwaja Ahrar had conspired with the team under the leadership of Darvish Mukhammad tarkhan, the the brother-in law of Abusaid decided to not to go to the audience and the conversations with Khwaja Ahrar. The shaykh ul-islam gave even fatwa to confiscate the properties of Khwaja Ahrar. Except for the Abulali tarkhan, the relative of Darvish Mukhammad tarkhan, all emirs agreed. Abulali tarkhan was warning that this was not leading to good consequences. As a result, shaykh ul-islam’s this act didn’t bring luck to him and he was forced to go to Herat, where he died of severe illness. The author of “Rashakhat” links it with the curse directed at him by the Khwaja Ahrar. See: Bartold V.V. Ulugbek I yego vremya. Soch. V 9-ti tomakh. T. 2. Ch.2. – Moscow: Nauka, 1964. –P.172 17. Pulat Saliyev. Uzbeklar, ham(va) Temur bolalari // “Maarif va uqutguvchi” magazine. – Tashkent, 1928. №5-6. P.57. 18. Among the works dedicated to the Shaibanikhan there is a “Mekhmonnomai Bukhoro” written by the Fazlullakh ibn Ruzbekhkhan. But Pulat Soliyev didn’t have the opportunity of using this paper. Because, the manuscript version of this paper found by the Uzbek enlightenment figure Miyan Buzruk (18911938) in the Nuru Usmaniya library in 1925 has not been presented to the wide public, also in the article devoted to the work published by the Miyan Buzruk there is a brief passage on Shaibani. The paper was studied by the Uzbekistani scholars 50-70s of the 20th century, Russian language translation, and in the years of independence some data on the work in uzbek translation was published. See: Salye M.A. Maloizvestniy istochnik po istorii Uzbekistana “Mekhman-name” / Trudi Instituta vostokovedeniya AN Uz SSR, vip.3, 1954; Fazlallakh ibn Ruzbikhan Isfakhani, Mikhman-name-yi Bukhoro / Perevod, predisloviye I primechaniya R.P.Djalilovoy. Moskva: Nauka, 1976; Turayev H. Miyon Buzruk Solikhov (hayoti va ilmiy merosi) // “Bukhoro mavjlari” magazine. –Bukhoro, 2001. №1. –P.42-43. 19. The author writes about the Akhmad Mirza’s invitation of Shaibanikhan to Samarkand. The purpose was to use the assistance of Shaibanikhan in the struggle against Mongols. But the development of the events shows the integration of shaibani Uzbeks with the Mongols, their changing sides against the Akhmad Mirza. Pulat Soliyev thoroughly reveals the issue. 20. For the decay of this great culture Pulat Soliyev accuses both dynasties to the same level. But he supports the invasion of the Azerbaijan, Iran, Levant, India by Emir Timur, transporting the wealth of these countries to Transoxania and his partly contribution to the development of his country. 21. Anke fon Kyugelgen. Legimitasiya sredneaziatskiy dinastii mangitov v proizvedeniyax ix istorikov (XVIII-XIX vv.). -Almati: Dayk Press,2004. 22. Axmedov B.A. Gosudarstvo kochevix uzbekov.- Moskva: Nauka, 1965. 23. Ahmedov B.A. O’zbek ulusi.- Toshkent: Nur, 1992. 24. Babadjanov B.K. Voprosu o vospriyatii statusa sufiyskogo shayxa na primere Xvadja Axrara // Arabskiy Vostok , islam, drevnyya Araviya. Sbornik statey v chest V.V.Naumkina. –Moskva, 2005. B.177190. 25. Bartold V.V. Ulugbek I ego vremya.Soch. V 9-I tomax. T.2.ch.2- Moskva: Nauka, 1964.- B.169-172. 26. Bartold V.V. K istorii orosheniya Turkestana. Soch.T.Sh.-Moskva, Nauka,1965. 27. Boldirev A.N. Eshyo raz k voprosu o XodjaAxrare // Duxovenstvo I politicheskaya jizn na Blijnem I Srednem vostoke v period feodalizma. Sbornik.statey.-Moskva: Nauka,1985.-str.47-63. 28. Bulot Soliyev. XVII-XIX asr(larda ) iqtisodiy va tujjoriy munosabatlar // “ma’orif va o’qituvchi” jurnali.Toshkent, 1929,1-son.-B-52-56. 29. Valixo’jayev B. Xoja Axror tarixi.-Toshkent: Yozuvchi,1994. 30. Veselovskiy N.I. Ocherk istoriko- geograficheskix svedeniy o Xivinskom xanstve ot drevneyshix vremyon do nastoyashego. Spb,1877. 31. Germanov V.A. Proffesor Pulat Saliyev I ego vremya.-T.,”Fan”, 2002. 32. Kadirova M. Jitiya Xodja Axrara. Opit sistemnogo analiza po rekonstruksii biografii Xodja Axrara I istorii roda Ahraridov. -Tashkent: fransuzskiy institute issledovaniy Tsentralnoy Azii (IFEAC), 2007. 33. Kazakov B.A. Ananimnoye jitiye Xodji Ahrara // Istochnikovedeniye I tekstologiya srednevekovogo Blijnego Srednego Vostoka. Sbornikstatey.-Moskva: Nauka,1984-ctr. 103-108. 34. Karimov E. Xo’ja Axror hayoti va faoliyati. Toshkent: Ma’naviyat, 2003. 35. Muravyov N. Puteshestviye v Turkmeniyu I Xivu. Ch.1-2.-Moskva, 1822. 36. Poslannik Petra I naVostoke. Posolstvo Florio Beneveni v Persiyu I Buxaru v 1718-1725 godax // Podgotovka teksta, vstupitelnaya statya I kommentarii V.G.Volovnikova.-Moskva: Nauka, 1986. 37. Po’lat Soliyev. O’zbeklar, ham Temur bolalari // “Maprif va o’qituvchi” jurnali.- Toshkent, 1928.№5- 38. “Rashahat”, Litografiya. Lakhnav nashri. 39. Salye M.A. Maloizvestniy istochnik po istorii Uzbekistana “Mexman-Name”// Trudi Instituta vostokovedeniya AN UzSSR, vip.3, 1954. 40. Samarkandskiye dokumenti XV-XVI vv. (O vladeniyax Xodji Axrara v Sredniy Azii I Afganistane).// Faksimile, kriticheskiy tekst, perevod, vvedeniye, primichaniya I ukazateli O.D.Chexovich.- Mockva: Nauka, 1974.