METAPHORICAL CONCEPTUAL FORMATIONS IN CONTEMPORARY ENGLISH EDUCATIONAL DISCOURSE (BASED ON TED-TALKS VIDEO LECTURES) (50-53)

Архив в PDF формате
Дата публикации статьи в журнале: 2020/02/17
Название журнала: Восточно Европейский Научный Журнал, Выпуск: 53, Том: 9, Страницы в выпуске: 50-53
Автор: Mosiichuk A.V.
, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsyubynsʹkyi State Pedagogical University , candidate of science (philology)
Автор: Shubovych I.I.
, Vinnytsia Mykhailo Kotsyubynsʹkyi State Pedagogical University , master of philology
Анотация: The paper examines metaphorical conceptual formations in contemporary English educational discourse from the perspective of Conceptual Metaphor Theory. The paper claims that conceptual metaphors may be indicative of different types of teacher-student interaction, in particular teacher- or student-centered learning. The results of the research show that in contemporary English educational discourse, TEACHING is metaphorically associated with TRAVELLING, PLAYING, ACTING, and COOKING, whereby the focus is on both, the students and instructor, as characteristic of the student-centered approach.
Ключевые слова: Conceptual Metaphor Theory   conceptual metaphor   educational discourse   
Данные для цитирования: Mosiichuk A.V. , Shubovych I.I. , . METAPHORICAL CONCEPTUAL FORMATIONS IN CONTEMPORARY ENGLISH EDUCATIONAL DISCOURSE (BASED ON TED-TALKS VIDEO LECTURES) (50-53). Восточно Европейский Научный Журнал. Филологические науки. 2020/02/17; 53(9):50-53.

Список литературы: 1. Кабаченко Е.Г. Метафорическое моделирование базисных концептов педагогического дискурса: дис. ... кандидата филологических наук: 10.02.01. Екатеринбург, 2007. 239 с. [Kabachenko E.G. Metaforicheskoe modelirovanie bazisnyh konceptov peda-gogicheskogo diskursa: dis. ... kandidata filologicheskih nauk: 10.02.01. Ekaterinburg, 2007. 239 s. (in Russ).] 2. Карасик В.И. Характеристики педагогического дискурса // Языковая личность: аспекты лингвистики и лингводидактики: сб. науч. тр. Волгоград, 1999. С. 3–18. [Karasik V.I. Harakteristiki pedagogicheskogo diskursa // Jazykovaja lichnost': aspekty lingvistiki i lingvodidaktiki: sb. nauch. tr. Volgograd, 1999. S. 3–18. (in Russ).] Wschodnioeuropejskie Czasopismo Naukowe (East European Scientific Journal) #1(53), 20 53 3. Каратанова О.А. Лингвистически релевантные нарушения педагогического дискурса: автореф. дис. ... кандидата филол. наук: 10.02.19. Волгоград, 2003. 35 с. [Karatanova O.A. Lingvisticheski relevantnye narushenija pedagogicheskogo diskursa: avtoref. dis. ... kandidata filol. nauk: 10.02.19. Volgograd, 2003. 35 s. (in Russ).] 4. Мельникова Н.В. Метафора в педагогическом дискурсе: дис. … канд. филол. наук: 10.02.01. Ростов-на-Дону, 2007. 68 с. [Mel'nikova N.V. Metafora v pedagogicheskom diskurse: dis. … kand. filol. nauk: 10.02.01. Rostov-na- Donu, 2007. 68 s. (in Russ).] 5. Cameron L. Metaphor in educational discourse.London, New York: Continuum; 2003. 294 p. 6. Dijk, TA van. On macrostructures, mental models, and other inventions: a brief personal history of the Kintsch‐van Dijk theory. In: Discourse comprehension: essays in honor of Walter Kintsch. Hillsdale; 1995. p. 45–46. 7. Garrett T. Student-centered and teachercentered classroom management: a case study of three elementary teachers. The Journal of Classroom Interaction [Internet]. 2008 March [cited 2020 Jan 25]; 43(1): 34-47. Available from: www.jstor.org/stable/4624889 8. Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press; 2003. 191 p. 9. Mosiichuk AV. Positive thinking vs. negative thinking: metaphorical conceptual models as a format of representation. Linguistic studies [Internet]. 2018 June [cited 2020 Jan 25]; 35: 115-118. Available from: http://jlingst.donnu.edu.ua/article/view/5614 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31558/1815-3070.2018.35.16. 10. Paltridge B. Discourse analysis: an introduction. London, New York: Continuum; 2008. 241 p.